Up for discussion again at the Planning,
Environmental and Development Committee was the thorny subject of Nairn South.
The Council planning high heid yins pointed again to an existing traffic
assessment that would allow for 320 houses on the site. Michael Green made a
plea for a rethink after the first and each subsequent batch of houses are
built. His proposal for a new traffic assessments every 100 houses found favour
with the committee and he also raised other concerns that many gurnites will
have heard before over previous months and now years.
The town’s three Community Councils don’t
want this development until the infrastructure, including a bypass, is in
place. Michael Green spoke on the behalf of many people in Nairn on Wednesday
in the Council chamber at Glenurquhart
Road as he reiterated what
the West, River and Suburban CCs and many others feel. Here’s what Michael
said:
“In Nairn this is not a popular development
– It’s not! Folk are just wondering why it appears to put the cart before the
horse when we are having a development on this scale proposed when we don’t
have the bypass. The logical thing to have done here would have been to have
had the bypass and then you could have looked at a development which with the
bypass could cope with the traffic problems. That brings me round to the two
main areas of concern which Brian and Malcolm will have heard many, many times
from many people.
The first one is the inability of the local
infrastructure to cope with the proposed increase in traffic. Now as was shown
in the overhead, there’s currently Balblair Road and Cawdor Road these are two
old fashioned B class roads and they have to deal with traffic, and I’ll just
Labour this – a few points here: the Queens’s Park housing estate, the
hospital, the Nairn County football ground, several old peoples homes, the new
Broadleigh housing development, the Council technical department, Gordons Sawmill
and a busy garden centre - all back and forth into the town centre. At the
narrowest point where Cawdor
Road and Balblair Road
merge there is a one lane choke point. This is effectively a chicane and even as
it stands just now it is a real bone of contention with people because there
are tailbacks developing on either side at certain times.
So when I read that the traffic impact
assessment states that the infrastructure can cope with the increase in traffic
from such a development, myself and many others don’t really agree and feel
that this increase in traffic will result in making an already difficult and
tricky situation much, much worse and equally importantly: it could start the
creation of new rat runs. Rat runs in an urban development could have very
serious consequences.
So on the 1st point and I think
it has been well documented and the officials agree it, I would like to propose
we have a pause and review after the 1st hundred have been built,
for a new traffic impact assessment plus local consultation.
The second area of major concern lies
around the impact the proposed development will have on Gordons. Gordons
Sawmill has been established for well over 100 years. They’re the biggest
employer in Nairn. There’s over 100 direct employees and probably a similar
amount in related jobs. Now they’ve raised concerns that the development could
not only hamper their future business expansion but could threaten the
viability of their current business. Their concerns are around noise levels and
mitigation measures. Now the strategic master plan states that the developer
should be responsible for noise mitigation measures. For example bunds and acoustic
fences to ensure that noise levels do not exceed 45 decibels during the day and
25 at night.
Now, Environmental Health have now stated
and I quote: “In assessing the statutory nuisance the Councils will be required
to take into account several considerations including nature and character of
noise and not just compliance with an agreed noise.”
I welcome the agreement that we will work together to find a solution to this.
I don’t think that I need to go into much more technical detail other than to
agree, as we are well aware that this is a serious issue and it needs to be
resolved to the satisfaction of Nairn’s largest employer.”